Appeal No. 2006-2325 Page 5 Application No. 10/340,980 On reflection, we find that the examiner failed to meet his evidentiary burdun of establishing a prima facie case of anticipation. Accordingly, we reverse the rejection of claims 1-9 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Patridge REVERSED ) Toni R. Scheiner ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ) Donald E. Adams ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) ) INTERFERENCES ) ) Richard M. Lebovitz ) Administrative Patent Judge )Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007