Appeal 2006-2327
Application 10/239,287
Under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a):
claims 1-5, 8, 11, 12, 15, 16, 20, 21, and 27 are rejected as being
unpatentable over Brescia in view of Mohrman, Kealy, and Fritsch;
claims 1-6, 8, 9, 11-13, 15, 16, 19, 21, 22, 25, and 27 are rejected over
Frobel in view of Mohrman, Kealy, and Fritsch, and claims 14, 17, 28 and
29 are correspondingly rejected over these references and further in view of
Buck;
claims 1-9, 11-13, 15, 16, 21, 24, and 27 are rejected over Palmer in
view of Mohrman, Kealy, and Fritsch;
claims 1-9, 11-17, 19-23, 25 and 27-29 are rejected over Poppel in
view of Mohrman, Kealy, and Fritsch; and
claims 1-9, 11-13, 15-17, 19-22, 24, 25, and 27 are rejected over
Karwowski in view of Mohrman, Kealy, and Fritsch, and claims 14, 17, 28,
and 29 are correspondingly rejected over these references and further in
view of Buck.
We refer to the Brief and Reply Brief and to the Answer for a
complete exposition of the opposing viewpoints expressed by the Appellants
and by the Examiner concerning the above noted rejections.
Within the respective rejections before us, no individual claim has
been separately argued by the Appellants in the manner required by 37
C.F.R. § 41.37(c)(1)(vii)(2005). Accordingly, the claims in each rejection
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007