The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ADRIEN BEAUDOIN, MARYSE ST-GEORGES and GENEVIEVE MARTIN ____________ Appeal No. 2006-2333 Application No. 10/280,849 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before KIMLIN, WARREN and GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges. KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-4, 7-11, 13 and 14. Claim 1 is illustrative: 1. A method for the recovery of substantially all of the proteins and enzymes from a raw liquid milk product, said method comprising the step of mixing said liquid milk product with a precipitating agent selected from the group consisting of ethanol and acetone, agitating said liquid milk product and said precipitating agent for a period of time sufficient to form a precipitate, and subsequently recovering said precipitate, said precipitating agent being present in an amount sufficient to precipitate all of said proteins including non-denatured enzymes from said liquid milk product. The examiner relies upon the following references as evidence of obviousness:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007