Ex Parte Bleizeffer et al - Page 22



             Appeal No. 2006-2354                                                  Page 22                    
             Application No. 09/877,157                                                                          
             administrator, as shown in Figure 8O.  Abraham, page 41, lines 26-30.  As such,                     
             we find that Abraham discloses all of the elements of claim 23.  The only                           
             difference between Abraham and the claimed interface is that the list of data                       
             elements displayed in Abraham contains data elements relating to a security policy                  
             instead of a privacy policy.  For the same reasons provided above in the discussion                 
             of claim 1, we find that this difference is not a patentable distinction over the prior             
             art.  Accordingly, we sustain the examiner’s rejection of claim 23 under 35 U.S.C.                  
             § 103(a).                                                                                           



























Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007