Appeal No. 2006-2354 Page 22 Application No. 09/877,157 administrator, as shown in Figure 8O. Abraham, page 41, lines 26-30. As such, we find that Abraham discloses all of the elements of claim 23. The only difference between Abraham and the claimed interface is that the list of data elements displayed in Abraham contains data elements relating to a security policy instead of a privacy policy. For the same reasons provided above in the discussion of claim 1, we find that this difference is not a patentable distinction over the prior art. Accordingly, we sustain the examiner’s rejection of claim 23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).Page: Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007