The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
Ex parte RICHARD A. JEWELL and JULIE A. REIMER
Appeal No. 2006-2357
Application No. 10/666,262
ON BRIEF
Before KIMLIN, PAK and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
REMAND TO THE EXAMINER
At page 2 of appellants’ brief, appellants state that
“[t]his Appeal is related to the Appeal in Application No.
10/228,815, filed August 27, 2002.” The related application was
remanded to the examiner for consideration of specification data
that appellants rely upon for demonstrating unexpected results
(Appeal No. 2006-1073, remanded March 29, 2006). The examiner’s
answer in the related appeal did not provide a discussion or
rebuttal of the specification data. Likewise, in the present
appeal, appellants rely upon specification data that is not
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007