The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte VIKTORS BERSTIS
____________
Appeal No. 2006-2363
Application No. 10/015,880
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JERRY SMITH, SAADAT, and HOMERE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. ' 134(a) from
the Examiner=s final rejection of claims 1-4, 6-10, 12-17 and 19-
21. Claims 5, 11 and 18 have been canceled.
We reverse.
BACKGROUND
Appellant=s invention is directed to image processing
including sensor design and moiré reduction. Among the
interference artifacts resulting from uniform grid-like features
of the image is the moiré pattern which often resembles
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007