Ex Parte Maison et al - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                  
            publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                          

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                                __________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                                __________                                                  
                Ex parte DAVID L. MAISON, JEFFREY NASET, CHARLES R. PLAINE,                                 
            CHRIS KIICK and MARK HATTARKI                                                                   
                                                __________                                                  
                                          Appeal No. 2006-2373                                              
            Application No. 10/113,083                                                                      
                                               ___________                                                  
                                                ON BRIEF                                                    
                                               ___________                                                  
            Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent                                   
            Judges.                                                                                         
            THOMAS , Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           


                                                DECISION                                                    
                   Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of             
            claims 1 through 3 and 7 through 14.  The examiner has indicated the allowability               
            of claims 19 through 26 and has objected to claims 4 through 6 and 15 through 18.               








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007