The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte STEVEN MICHAEL HEALY and THOMAS HEASLIP ____________ Appeal No. 2006-2374 Application No. 10/164,670 Technology Center 3700 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before LEVY, NAPPI and HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges. HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the examiner's final rejection of claims 14-17 and 25-27, all of the claims pending in the application. Claims 1-13 and 18-24 have been canceled. We reverse and make a new ground of rejection pursuant 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007