Appeal No. 2006-2417 Page 9 Application No. 09/200,791 1264, 1271 (Fed. Cir. 1984) (“a disclosure that anticipates under § 102 also renders the claim invalid under § 103, for ‘anticipation is the epitome of obviousness,’ In re Fracalossi, 681 F.2d 792, 215 USPQ 569 (CCPA 1982).”). Therefore, the rejection is affirmed. As set forth above claims 2-9, 11-21, 23-29, and 31-41 fall together with claim 1. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED Toni R. Scheiner ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ) Donald E. Adams ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) ) INTERFERENCES ) ) Lora M. Green ) Administrative Patent Judge ) DA/dymPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007