The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte SHEN BUSWELL, RIO T. RIVAS,
MEHRGAN KHAVARI, PAUL TEMPLIN,
MARK H. MACKENZIE and CONRAD JENSSEN
_____________
Appeal 2006-2433
Application 10/061,492 Deleted: 10,
Technology Center 1700
_______________
Decided: August 30, 2006 Deleted: [date of mailing]
_______________
Before WARREN, KRATZ, and GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
REMAND TO THE EXAMINER
Deleted: e
We remand the application to the Examiner for consideration and
explanation of issues raised by the record. 37 CFR §41.50(a)(1) (2005);
Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) § 1211 (8th ed., Rev. 3,
August 2005).
Deleted: f
The record shows that in the final rejection mailed August 5, 2004, the
Deleted: r
Examiner set forth seven grounds of rejection, all under 35 U.S.C. § Deleted:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007