Appeal No. 2006-2443
Application No. 10/012,968
Thus, in our view, the examiner’s conclusion that
Kuribayashi’s clearing signal causes a bleeding off of
accumulated charges in pixels in the display panel is, at best,
mere speculation and that is not a proper basis for reaching a
conclusion of anticipation under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).
We also will not sustain the rejection of claims 31, 32, and
34 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 since Stoye does not provide for the
deficiency of Kuribayashi in lacking a teaching of bleeding off
accumulated charges in pixels in the display panel.
The examiner’s decision is reversed.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007