The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte SUBRAMANYAM A. IYER, VIJAYAKUMAR S. RAMACHANDRARAO, and ROBERT B. TURKOT, JR. ________________ Appeal 2006-2444 Application 10/342,053 Technology Center 1700 ________________ Decided: September 20, 2006 ________________ Before PAK, WALTZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 3, 8, and 11 through 18, which are the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007