The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte Robert E. Smith III _____________ Appeal No. 2006-2450 Application No. 10/211,828 Technology Center 3700 ______________ HEARD October 18, 2006 _______________ Before GROSS, LEVY, and NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges. NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the final rejection of claims 1 through 3, 5 through 7, 9 through 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19 through 21 and 23. Claims 4, 8, 12, 15, 18 and 22 have been canceled. For the reasons stated infra we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 3, 5 through 7, 9 through 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19 through 21 and 23.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007