Ex Parte Zicker et al - Page 1




                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        
                                                                                                            
                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                         
                                                __________                                                   
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                                __________                                                   
                         Ex parte   STEVEN CURTIS ZICKER, CHADWICK E. DODD                                   
                                  DENNIS JEWELL, and DALE A. FRITSCH                                         
                                                __________                                                   
                                           Appeal No. 2006-2463                                              
                                         Application No. 10/065,326                                          
                                                __________                                                   
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                    
                                                __________                                                   
            Before MILLS, GREEN, and LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                 
            MILLS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              


                              VACATUR and REMAND TO THE EXAMINER                                             

                   On consideration of the record we find this case is not in condition for a decision       
            on appeal.  For the reasons that follow, we vacate1 the pending rejections and remand            
            the application to the examiner to consider the following issues and to take appropriate         
            action.                                                                                          
                   Claims 1-7 and 9-11 are on appeal.   Claim 8 has been withdrawn from                      
            consideration by the examiner.                                                                   

                                                                                                             
            1 Lest there be any misunderstanding, the term “vacate” in this context means to set aside or to void.
            When the Board vacates an examiner’s rejection, the rejection is set aside and no longer exists. 





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007