Appeal 2006-2468
Application 10/149,875
In conclusion, based on the foregoing and for reasons set forth in the
majority opinion on the anticipation rejection that follows, the Examiner’s
decision to reject claims 1-6, 8-22, 25-40, 42-53, 60, and 62-69 under
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Seiden is reversed; and the
Examiner’s decision to reject claims 1-6, 8-22, 25-40, 42-53, 60, and 62-69
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Seiden is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
10
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007