Ex Parte Fischle et al - Page 2


                   Appeal Number:  2006-2476                                                                                       
                   Application Number:  10/269,089                                                                                 

                   discharged by the brake disc since determination of said last-determined disc                                   
                   temperature; and                                                                                                
                          determining current caliper temperature (Tcaliper, current) of the brake caliper of the                  
                   wheel-braking device as a function of the current disc temperature (Tdisc, current) of the                      
                   brake disc.                                                                                                     
                          No prior art references of record were relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                      
                   appealed claims.                                                                                                
                          Claims 1 through 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as                            
                   being based on a disclosure which is not enabling.                                                              
                          Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (mailed January 26, 2006) for the                             
                   examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejection, and to appellants’ Brief (filed                      
                   November 3, 2005) and Reply Brief (filed March 27, 2006) for appellants’ arguments                              
                   thereagainst.                                                                                                   

                                                            OPINION                                                                
                          We have carefully considered the claims, the applied prior art references, and the                       
                   respective positions articulated by appellants and the examiner.  As a consequence of our                       
                   review, we will reverse the enablement rejection of claims 1 through 14.                                        
                          The only issue is this appeal is whether or not the specification enables the skilled                    
                   artisan to obtain the “last-determined disc temperature.”  See Answer, page 3.  Appellants                      
                   explain (Brief, pages 5 and 6) that “a person skilled in the art would easily understand                        
                   that the phrase ‘last-determined disk temperature’ refers simply to the temperature                             
                   determined in the immediately preceding iteration of the process,” or, rather, “the                             
                   beginning value for any particular calculation is nothing more than the ending value for                        
                   the preceding calculation.”  Appellants recognize that (Brief, page 6) “[t]his leaves only                      
                   the question of how the initial value for commencing the iterative process according to                         
                   the invention is obtained, when the vehicle is started.”  Appellants (Reply Brief, page 1)                      
                   direct our attention to Figure 3 and paragraphs [0029] through [0040] of the specification.                     
                          Figure 3 and the corresponding disclosure indicate that when the vehicle is first                        
                   started, the switch-on temperature of the hydraulic assembly is measured and compared                           
                   with the stored, measured switch-off temperature of the hydraulic assembly.  If the                             

                                                                2                                                                  



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007