Ex Parte Armstrong et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2006-2490                                                                               
                Application 10/238,791                                                                         
                invention (Final Office Action dated Apr. 29, 2005, page 1).  We have                          
                jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                      
                      According to Appellants, the invention is directed to a gel formed                       
                during the process described in the parent application, now U.S. Patent No.                    
                5,779,761, and a solid formed from the gel (Br. 2).  Independent claim 95                      
                and dependent claim 107 are illustrative of the invention and are reproduced                   
                below:                                                                                         
                             95.    A gel of a powder elemental material or a powder alloy                     
                      thereof and a halide salt and liquid alkali metal or liquid alkaline earth               
                      metal or mixtures thereof produced by the method of submerging a                         
                      halide vapor of the elemental material or mixtures of halide vapors                      
                      into a flowing liquid alkali metal or liquid alkaline earth metal or                     
                      mixtures thereof to produce powder elemental material or a powder                        
                      alloy thereof and a halide salt in the presence of excess liquid alkali                  
                      metal or liquid alkaline earth metal or mixtures thereof and separating                  
                      excess liquid metal to form the gel.                                                     
                      107.    The gel of claim 95 cooled to a solid.                                           

                      Claims 95-128 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph,                     
                as failing to comply with the written description requirement (Answer 3).                      
                This is the only rejection in this appeal (Br. 2).1                                            
                      Based on the totality of the record, including due consideration of                      
                Appellants’ arguments and the Jacobsen Declaration (Exhibit A attached to                      
                the Brief), we AFFIRM the rejection on appeal essentially for the reasons                      
                stated in the Answer, as well as those reasons set forth below.                                
                                                                                                              
                1 We note similar rejections and issues have been the subject of Appeal No. 2005-1905          
                (Application No. 10/125,988) and Appeal No. 2006-0902 (Application No. 10/125,942),            
                with Decisions mailed in these Appeals on Oct. 21, 2005, and June 23, 2006,                    
                respectively.  We also note an appeal in related Application No. 10/238,297, and we have       
                considered abandoned Application No. 08/283,358 (filed Aug. 1, 1994) and related U.S.          
                Patent Nos. 5,779,761; 5,958,106; and 6,409,797.                                               
                                                      2                                                        


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007