Ex Parte Fernando et al - Page 1





                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                     
                        for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                     


                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                  _______________                                                      
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                  _______________                                                      
                                            Ex Parte JOHN S. FERNANDO,                                                 
                                        HYUN LEE, and TREVOR E. LITTLE                                                 
                                                Appeal No. 2006-2521                                                   
                                              Application No. 09/788,582                                               
                                                  _______________                                                      
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                         
                                                  _______________                                                      

                 Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                  
                 JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                             
                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                                                                                                                      
                 This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection                  
                 of claims 1-23, which constitute all the claims in the application.                                   
                 The disclosed invention pertains to a method and apparatus for transferring multi-                    
                 source/multi-sink control signals using a differential signaling technique.  More                     
                 particularly, an “active” state is transferred on a control signal network by inverting the           
                 previous voltage level, and an “inactive state” is transferred by maintaining the previous            
                 level.                                                                                                









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007