Appeal No. 2006-2526
Application No. 10/377,942
We consider many of appellants= remarks in the briefs not germane to the issue
at hand; i.e., whether these claims are met by this reference. We have considered all of
appellants= arguments in the briefs but are not persuaded of error in the examiner=s
claim interpretation or in the finding of anticipation. We sustain the rejection of claims
19 and 23 under 35 U.S.C. ' 102 as being anticipated by Hsiao.
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claims 19 and 23 under 35 U.S.C. ' 102 as being anticipated by
Hsiao is affirmed.
-6-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007