Ex Parte Page - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                        
                  for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.                       

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                               ________________                                                     
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                               ________________                                                     
                                        Ex parte ROBERT E. PAGE, JR.                                                
                                               ________________                                                     
                                                Appeal 2006-2601                                                    
                                             Application 10/364,286                                                 
                                            Technology Center 1700                                                  
                                               ________________                                                     
                                            Decided:  August 31, 2006                                               
                                               ________________                                                     
                 Before KIMLIN, GARRIS, and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                 
                 KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               


                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                       This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-41.  Claims 1                         
                 and 5 are illustrative:                                                                            
                 1. A synthetic gem comprising elements recovered from human remains.                               
                 5. A method of making a synthetic gem comprising elements recovered                                
                 from human remains comprising the steps of:  a) cremating human remains                            
                 to produce carbon; b) filtering the carbon; c) purifying the carbon;                               
                                                                                                                   




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007