The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte WILLIAM D. FISHER
________________
Appeal 2006-2643
Application 09/771,092
Technology Center 1743
________________
Decided: September 28, 2006
________________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-14 and 35-42.
Claim 1 is illustrative:
1. A method comprising dispensing drops from a pulse jet and striking
the pulse jet at least once, wherein the pulse jet comprises a chamber and a
thermoelectric or piezoelectric ejector in the chamber.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007