The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ANGELICA QUINTANA
AND TED ZIEMKOWSKI
__________
Appeal No. 2006-2750
Application No. 10/104,498
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before HAIRSTON, RUGGIERO, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 50. In the answer, the
examiner indicated that claims 3, 4, 15, 25 and 26 are objected to as being dependent upon a
rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the
limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Accordingly, claims 1, 2, 5 through 14,
16 through 24 and 27 through 50 remain before us on appeal.
The disclosed invention relates to a method and system for recording a history of uses
made of an image file in an electronic event log.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007