Ex Parte Eijsackers et al - Page 1




                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                         
                                    publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                     


                                 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                         __________                                                            
                                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                                            
                                                         __________                                                            
                             Ex parte  MARCEL JOHAN EIJSACKERS, BERNARD KLEINE,                                                
              KATJA PETER, and WERNER WITTKE                                                                                   
                                                         __________                                                            
                                                    Appeal No. 2006-2751                                                       
                                                 Application No. 10/205,090                                                    
                                                        ___________                                                            
                                                         ON BRIEF                                                              
                                                        ___________                                                            

              Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
              HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                           



                                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           
              This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 12 and 14 through 26.                             
                      The disclosed invention relates to at least one common operating console for operating at                
              least one motor-adjustable microscope functional element, and at least one motor-adjustable                      
              micromanipulator for micromanipulation of biological specimens.                                                  


                                                                                                                              
                      Claim 1 is the only independent claim on appeal, and it reads as follows:                                





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007