Ex Parte WARING et al - Page 7


            Appeal No. 2006-2797                                                          Page 7              
            Application No. 09/341,821                                                                        

                   To anticipate, every element and limitation of the claimed invention must be               
            found in a single prior art reference, arranged as in the claim. Karsten Mfg. Corp. v.            
            Cleveland Golf Co., 242 F.3d 1376, 1383, 58 USPQ2d 1286, 1291 (Fed. Cir. 2001).  We               
            concur with the Examiner that Jass’s “valve-actuated aerosol package” contains all the            
            elements of the claimed “self-sealing barrier aerosol vessel,” anticipating claim 1.              
                   Jass’s dispensing valve is kept shut with a compression spring [30] that prevents          
            the flowable materials present in the containers from entering into the exit passageway.          
            Jass, column 3, lines 28-47.  The exit ports are opened by depressing the compression             
            spring to actuate the dispensing valve.  Id., column 4, lines 35-40.  Once actuated, the          
            “the gas under pressure in pressure tight chamber B” forces the piston upward, pushing            
            the flowable materials through the exit passageway and out through the dispensing                 
            valve.  Id., column 4, lines 38-45.  As a result, “a uniform, metered amount of the               
            flowable material” is discharged from the package.  Id., column 4, lines 46-58.  Jass             
            indicates that “dispensing valve assembly” forms “a pressure tight closure when the               
            valve is closed.  Id., column 3, lines 20-24.  This structure described by Jass can be            
            characterized as “self-sealing” since the compression spring [30] in combination with the         
            lower pressurized container keep the valve shut.  Jass states that the “relative metering”        
            of the flowable material from the container “is constant throughout the life of the               
            dispenser,” indicating that it contains “multiple doses,” as required by claim 1.  Id.,           
            column 4, line 66-column 5, line 2.                                                               
                   Appellants state that the “self-sealing plug” at column 2, lines 53-57 of Jass,            
            relates to the “pressure sealed chamber,” and is not “self-sealing” as required by the            
            claims.  Brief, page 3.  We agree that the self-sealing plug described by Jass is for the         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007