Appeal No. 2006-2808
Application 09/896,162
We will sustain the examiner’s rejection of claim 21 as being anticipated by Gill for
the reasons discussed above. Each of appellant’s arguments with respect to claim 21
repeats arguments that were considered above.
In summary, we have sustained the examiner’s rejection with respect to each claim
on appeal. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 5-7, 9, 10, 15-17, and
19-21 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may
be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
)
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JERRY SMITH ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
MAHSHID D. SAADAT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JS:pgc
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007