Ex Parte Zhong et al - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written         
                               for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                   

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                                __________                                                  
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                __________                                                  
                                      Ex parte SHENG-PING ZHONG,                                            
                                       RONALD A. SAHATJIAN, and                                             
                                                 ENXIN MA                                                   
                                                __________                                                  
                                           Appeal No. 2006-2826                                             
                                         Application No. 09/993,907                                         
                                                __________                                                  
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                   
                                                __________                                                  
            Before GREEN, LINCK, and LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                
            LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                   This appeal involves claims to a medical device coated with a hydrogel polymer.          
            The Examiner has rejected the claims as anticipated or obvious over prior art.  We have         
            jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.  We affirm.                                                 


                                                Background                                                  
                   The application relates to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of medical devices.          
            MRI produces images by detecting protons in the object which is being imaged.                   
            Specification, ¶ 3.  The object is placed in a powerful and uniform magnetic field.  Id.        







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007