The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PETER THURMANN, HANS IHRLICH, ARNOLD SCHILZ, HANS
JURGEN HOFMANN, INES KISTENBRUGGER, and MICHAEL AUER
____________
Appeal No. 2006-2839
Application No. 10/699,229
Technology Center 3600
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, OWENS, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1,
3-7 and 13. Claim 2 has been cancelled. Claims 8-12 have been indicated as
allowable, and claims 14-21 have been allowed (brief, page 2).
We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007