The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JEFFREY L. OSTAHOWSKI
and RONALD L. PANTER
____________
Appeal 2006-2860
Application 10/737,502
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 29, 2006
____________
Before PAK, WALTZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1-10.1
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.
1 The Examiner has indicated that the rejection of claims 6, 7, and 8 is
withdrawn. (Answer 6). Appellants have indicated that the subject matter
of claim 12 has been allowed and the subject matter of claim 11 has also
been allowed, however, these claims have been objected to by the Examiner.
(Br. 2).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007