Ex Parte Barnes et al - Page 2




               Appeal Number 2006-2869                                                                                                
               Application No. 10/385,520                                                                                             
                                                         BACKGROUND                                                                   
                       The appellants’ invention relates to a low profile gas burner for a cooking appliance                          
               (specification, page 1).  In particular, the invention relates to an intermediate portion of the gas                   
               burner maintaining a vertically spaced relationship between the inlet portion and the outlet                           
               portion of .75 inch to about 2.5 inch (specification, page 3).  More specifically, the intermediate                    
               portion maintains a vertically spaced relationship between the inlet portion and the outlet portion                    
               of at least one tubing diameter, and more preferably, two tubing diameters (id.).                                      

               Claim 1 is representative of the invention, and is reproduced as follows:                                              
                               A cooking appliance comprising:                                                                        
                               an oven cavity; and                                                                                    
                               a gas burner assembly positioned within the oven cavity, said gas burner assembly                      
                       including a first end, defining an inlet portion, interconnected with a second end, defining                   
                       an elongated outlet portion, through an intermediate portion, wherein said intermediate                        
                       portion maintains a vertically spaced relationship between the inlet portion and outlet                        
                       portion, said spaced relationship being from about 0.75 inches (1.91 cm) to about 2.5                          
                       inches (6.35cm).                                                                                               
                       The prior art reference of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed                        
               claims is:                                                                                                             
               Perry     3,422,809    Jan. 21, 1969                                                                                   

                       Claims 1-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Perry.                          
                       Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and the                              
               appellants regarding the above-noted rejection, we make reference to the answer (mailed March                          
               23, 2006) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejection, and to the brief (filed                   
               January 23, 2006) and reply brief (filed May 24, 2006) for the appellants’ arguments                                   
               thereagainst.                                                                                                          



                                                                  2                                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007