Appeal 2006-2874 Application 09/888,044 a first rear vertical support and a second rear vertical support attached to said face panel, said rear vertical supports being spaced apart and extending along the length of said face panel, said first rear vertical support being positioned adjacent to said first vertical end portion and said second rear vertical support being positioned adjacent to said second vertical end portion; and at least one rear horizontal support attached to said face panel, said rear horizontal support extending in between said pair of rear vertical supports; and a first channel member and a second channel member, each of said channel members having a U-shaped cross-section and being made from a metal, said first channel member being placed over and enclosing said first vertical end portion and said first rear vertical support and said second channel member being placed over and enclosing said second vertical end portion and said second rear vertical support, the first and second channel members forming exterior vertical edges of the shutter. GROUND OF REJECTION Claims 1-20 stand rejected under 35 USC § 103 as unpatentable over Taylor in view of Ruggles. The Examiner relies upon the following references as evidence of obviousness: Taylor US 5,848,505 Dec. 15, 1998 Ruggles US 6,014,839 Jan. 18, 2000 BACKGROUND The invention is directed to a shutter made from a synthetic polymer that is said to have improved strength. The shutter includes a face panel attached to a first rear vertical support and a second rear vertical support. First and second channel members secure the face panel to the rear vertical supports and enclose the corresponding vertical end portions and rear 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007