Ex Parte Zoeckler et al - Page 9



             Appeal No. 2006-2895                                                 Page 9                     
             Application No. 09/971,469                                                                         
             the art would have to operate the Anderson apparatus in a manner contrary to that                  
             disclosed in the patent, and as such, the circumstances are not inevitable.  Supp.                 
             Reply Brief, p. 4.  For the reasons provided by the appellants, we agree that the                  
             disclosure of Anderson does not inherently anticipate the claimed method.                          
                   With regard to the examiner’s rejection of independent claim 1 under                         
             35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Anderson in view of Walsh, the                       
             examiner determined that Anderson does not disclose applying the adhesive                          
             directly to the reinforcing material, however, Walsh teaches a method of applying                  
             a reinforcing strip/liners 130 to a sheet/box blank 128 using a spraying device 134                
             prior to registration of the two sheets.  Supp. Answer, p. 4.  The examiner found                  
             that it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time                
             the invention was made to use the teachings of Walsh in the invention of Anderson                  
             in order to produce a reinforced carton blank from a laminate for its reinforcing                  
             characteristics.  Supp. Answer, p. 4.                                                              
                   We find that Walsh does not cure the deficiency of Anderson because Walsh                    
             also fails to teach or suggest the step of cutting both a carton sheet and a                       
             reinforcing material to form carton blanks.  Walsh discloses forming a carton for                  
             holding a product, e.g., cereal, in which a continuous strip (128) of paperboard                   
             material is laminated to relatively narrow continuous strips (130) of a relatively                 
             flexible material and to a continuous film (136) of a relatively flexible fluid                    
             impervious plastic material.  Walsh, col. 6, line 59 – col. 7, line 17.  As shown in               
             Figure 11 of Walsh, the end of continuous strips (130) and the portions of the                     
             continuous film (136) are folded back upon themselves so that when the laminated                   
             material is passed through a die cutter; only the paperboard material (128) is cut.                
             Walsh, col. 7, lines 22-27.  As such, we find that neither Anderson nor Walsh,                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007