Appeal No. 2006-2919 Page 27 Application No. 10/291,955 unpatentable over the Houvener in view of Roustaei for the same reasons set forth in the rejection. In summary, we have sustained the examiner’s rejection of all claims under appeal. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-22 is affirmed. AFFIRMED. ) James D. Thomas ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Kenneth W. Hairston ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Jerry Smith ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) JS/sjc/eldPage: Previous 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007