Ex Parte England et al - Page 1



                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                 
                              for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                       

                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                          
                                                      ____________                                                             
                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                           
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                      ____________                                                             
                                           Ex parte DIANE M. ENGLAND,                                                          
                                               KARL J. HALTINER, JR.,                                                          
                                                 SEAN M. KELLY and                                                             
                                                MICHAEL T. FAVILLE                                                             
                                                      ____________                                                             
                                                    Appeal 2006-2939                                                           
                                                 Application 10/178,826                                                        
                                                 Technology Center 1700                                                        
                                                      ____________                                                             
                                              Decided: September 8, 2006                                                       
                                                      ____________                                                             

                  Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                               
                  KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                         

                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             
                          This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-13.  Claim 1 is                               
                  illustrative:                                                                                                
                          1.  In a fuel cell assembly including nickel-containing anodes and                                   
                  passageways leading to and from the anodes for conducting fuel to and from                                   
                  the anodes, wherein at least one of the passageways leading to the anode                                     
                  extends between a reformer and the anodes, the improvement comprising                                        





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007