The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DIANE M. ENGLAND, KARL J. HALTINER, JR., SEAN M. KELLY and MICHAEL T. FAVILLE ____________ Appeal 2006-2939 Application 10/178,826 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: September 8, 2006 ____________ Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges. KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-13. Claim 1 is illustrative: 1. In a fuel cell assembly including nickel-containing anodes and passageways leading to and from the anodes for conducting fuel to and from the anodes, wherein at least one of the passageways leading to the anode extends between a reformer and the anodes, the improvement comprisingPage: 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007