The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ARVID NEIL ARVIDSON, TERENCE LEE HORSTMAN,
MICHAEL JOHN MOLNAR, CHRIS TIM SCHMIDT,
and ROGER DALE SPENCER, JR.
____________
Appeal 2006-2989
Application 10/298,129
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: November 1, 2006
____________
Before KIMLIN, PAK, and WARREN , Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-45. Claim 1 is
illustrative:
1. A method comprising:
a) comminuting polycrystalline silicon rods,
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007