Ex Parte Bellander - Page 5




             Appeal No.  2006-3002                                                                                
             Application No.  10/399,820                                                                          
                    In the reply brief, appellant asserts (page 2) that it is not the purpose of the              
             freezer compartment to serve as a fresh food compartment, and that “[t]hus, to modify a              
             freezer compartment to have a temperature unsuitable for freezing food would render                  
             the freezer compartment unsuitable for its intended use as a freezer.”                               

                    From our review of the record, we find, for the reasons which follow, that the                
             teachings and suggestions of Shueh would not have suggested the invention of claim 5.                
             Shueh is directed to a top mount refrigerator (figure 1) having a lower, fresh food                  
             compartment 12 including drain tube 56, and an upper freezer compartment 14 (col. 1,                 
             lines 9-12, col. 2, lines 30-32 and col. 3, line 21).                                                
                    From the disclosure of Shueh, we find no description of a separate, thermally                 
             insulated compartment which is separated from the cooled interior food storage space,                
             and which is the same temperature as the cooled interior food storage space and which                
             is smaller than the cooled interior food storage space, as recited in claim 5.  We agree             
             with the examiner to the extent that the relative size and temperature of the freezer and            
             cooled interior food storage spaces would have been adjustable by an artisan.                        
             However, it is at this point that we part company with the examiner.                                 
             As correctly noted by appellant (brief, page 6) there is no motivation or                            
             suggestion to have made the freezer of Shueh larger than the fresh food compartment.                 
             Nor is there any motivation or suggestion to make the freezer and the fresh food                     
             compartments the same temperature.  Shueh discloses (col. 1, lines 12-19) that                       
                    The freezer compartment has an evaporator disposed in conjunction with                        
                    the walls thereof to provide below freezing temperature to the freezer                        
                    compartment.  A portion of the evaporator passes through the walls of the                     
                    fresh food compartment and is disposed within the fresh food                                  
                    compartment to provide cooling temperatures above the freezing point.                         
             From the disclosure of Shueh, we  find a teaching of the freezer being set below                     
             freezing temperature and having the fresh food storage areas cooled to temperatures                  
             above the freezing point.  We therefore find no support for having the freezer space                 

                                                        5                                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007