The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte DWIGHT POPLIN, MICHAEL J. ZELMAN, AIRELL R. CLARK II, and TODD S. SACHS __________ Appeal No. 2006-3032 Application No. 09/969,040 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before JERRY SMITH, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-3, 5-9, 12-14, 16, 17 and 19-21. We note that the examiner has withdrawn the rejection of dependent claim 11 in response to appellants’ arguments in the brief. Claims 4, 10, 15 and 18 have been cancelled.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007