Appeal No. 2006-3037
Application No. 10/033,225
specified remote storage device, the electronic document is accessed over the link.
The electronic document is then sent to certain destinations from the multifunction
device.
Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:
1. A method for providing access from a multifunction device to an
electronic document at a user-specified remote storage device, comprising:
identifying said user-specified remote storage device having said
electronic document based at least in part on a path thereto specified by a user
at said multifunction device;
establishing a link between said multifunction device and a user-specified
remote storage device having said electronic document;
accessing said electronic document at said user-specified remote storage
device from said multifunction device over said link established therebetween;
and
sending said electronic document from said multifunction device.
The examiner relies on the following reference:
Czyszczewski et al. (Czyszczewski) 6,577,907 June 10, 2003
(Filed April 24, 2000)
The following rejection1 is on appeal before us:
Claims 1, 4-12, and 14-27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being
unpatentable over Czyszczewski.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellant or the examiner, we make
reference to the briefs and the answer for the respective details thereof.
1 Although arguments were presented in the brief regarding a previous rejection of claims 1 and 12 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 101 [see brief, pages 5 and 6], the examiner subsequently withdrew this rejection [see answer, page 3; reply brief,
page 3].
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007