Appeal No. 2006-3038
Application No. 09/750,288
example, a closed curve is written with electronic ink on a sheet. When a
pushbutton switch is double-clicked, the stroke information of the closed curve is
recorded as special code corresponding to a search region. Accordingly, the
user can search the content designated within the search region. The
embodiment of Fig. 44B provides similar functionality except that the search
region is defined by a rectangle instead of a closed curve [Morishita, col. 25, lines
29-58; Figs. 44A and B].
In our view, once the user draws the curved or rectangular search region,
the search region is fixed, or “anchored,” relative to the object(s) of the displayed
information. Moreover, a data link between the region defined by the electronic
ink and at least the information storing section is inherently established to
facilitate the search function. This linked association fully meets the claimed link
that points to the electronic ink. In short, all limitations of claim 7 are fully met by
Morishita. Accordingly, the examiner’s anticipation rejection of that claim is
therefore sustained.
Regarding claim 8, appellants argue that Morishita does not re-flow
displayed information including an object and maintain the relationship of the
added electronic ink with the object as claimed. Appellants also argue that
Morishita does not disclose a layout engine [brief, page 22; reply brief, page 6].
The examiner argues that Morishita’s pen-based computer system inherently
includes editing features, and that the encircled text shown in Morishita would
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007