The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RAY. P. VINCENT, FRANK KOEHRMANN,
GEORGE E. GIVENS, CHRISTIAAN D. KRAUSS, EDWARD T. WOOD,
FRIEDHELM MAKOHL and DAVID B. HAUGHTON
_____________
Appeal No. 2006-3061
Application No. 10/405,405
Technology Center 3600
______________
HEARD: December 12, 2006
_______________
Before BAHR, NAPPI and HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges.
NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the final rejection
of claims 1 through 3. For the reasons stated infra we will not sustain the
examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 3.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007