The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte BERND BRUCHMANN, HANS RENZ,
RAINER KONIGER, ULRIKE EHE,
ULRICH TREULING, and RUDOLF MULLER-MALL
______________
Appeal 2006-3071
Application 09/811,987
Technology Center 1700
_______________
Decided: September 28, 2006
_______________
Before WARREN, KRATZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative
Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the
Examiner finally rejecting claims 1, 2, and 4 through 13. Claim 3, also of
record, has been held by the Examiner to encompass patentably subjected
matter but is objected to as being dependent on a rejected claim.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007