Appeal 2006-3109 Application 10/743,936 optimum results. In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 276, 205 USPQ 215, 219 (CCPA 1980). As a final point, we note that Appellants base no argument upon objective evidence of nonobviousness, such as unexpected results, which would serve to rebut the prima facie case of obviousness established by the Examiner. In conclusion, based on the foregoing, the Examiner’s decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2005). AFFIRMED clj Christopher John Rudy Suite 8 209 Huron Avenue Port Huron, MI 48060 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5Last modified: November 3, 2007