Appeal No. 2006-3137 Page 3
Application No. 10/037,799
interacts with 35 U.S.C. § 112, Paragraphs One and Two. See MPEP § 2185 and the
discussion of related issues.
Fifth, the Examiner is required to set forth claim interpretation as to how the “set
up information” limits the client system in independent claim 21:
21. A client computer system for synchronizing data records stored on the
client computer system with data records stored on a server system, the client
computer system comprising:
a database for storing the data records; and
a processor coupled to the database for creating setup information to the server
system,
wherein the setup information enables the server system to identify the client, to
identify where to find information the server system needs for synchronization
and to provide appropriate commands for the client.
Does the Examiner find that the set up information changes the recited structure
of the client or the recited operation of the client in independent claim 21? Similarly,
does the Examiner find that the set up information changes the recited structure of the
server or the recited operation of the server in independent claim 26?
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007