Ex Parte Park et al - Page 11

                  Appeal No. 2006-3146                                                                                     
                  Application No. 10/020,986                                                                               


                  persuasive, and we will sustain the rejection of independent claim 26 and                                
                  dependent claims 27-33 grouped therewith by Appellants.                                                  
                         With respect to dependent claims 12 and 22, Appellants rely upon the                              
                  asserted deficiency in the prima facie case of claims 10 and 19.  Since we                               
                  found a prima facie case of obviousness with respect to claims 10 and 19, we                             
                  will sustain the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of dependent claims 12 and                              
                  22.                                                                                                      
                         With respect to dependent claims 7 and 8, Appellants rely upon the                                
                  asserted deficiency in the prima facie case of claim 1.  Since we found a                                
                  prima facie case of obviousness with respect to claim 1, we will sustain the                             
                  rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of dependent claims 7 and 8.                                             
                         With respect to dependent claims 16-17 and 23-24, Appellants rely                                 
                  upon the asserted deficiency in the prima facie case of claim 1.  Since we                               
                  found a prima facie case of obviousness with respect to claims 10 and 19, we                             
                  will sustain the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of dependent claims 16-17                               
                  and 23-24.                                                                                               
                                                    CONCLUSION                                                             
                         To summarize, we have sustained the rejections of claims 1 and 4-34                               
                  under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                                                                                   







                                                            11                                                             


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007