The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TOMIYA MORI
____________
Appeal 2006-3158
Application 09/945,764
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: December 15, 2006
____________
Before WALTZ, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and PAK, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s refusal to
allow claims 1 through 19, which are the only claims pending in this
application, as amended subsequent to the Final Rejection (see the
Amendment dated Sep. 25, 2003, entered as per the Advisory Action dated
Oct. 15, 2003). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
According to Appellant, the invention is directed to a heat-sensitive
stencil comprising a thermoplastic resin film on which a porous resin layer
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007