The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte CHARLES W. FINCH and KENNETH E. FERSCH ________________ Appeal 2006-3191 Application 10/397,765 Technology Center 1700 ________________ Decided: December 5, 2006 ________________ Before WALTZ, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s Final rejection of claims 1 through 20, which are the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. According to Appellants, the invention is directed to a method of purifying pesticides to reduce the crystalline inhibiting impurities (Br. 2-3). Independent claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and is reproduced below:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007