The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
___________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___________
Ex parte Barclay J. Tullis,
Carl Picciotto, and Jun Gao
___________
Appeal No. 2006-3218
Application No. 10/233,845
Technology Center 2800
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before KRASS, DIXON, AND HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §134 from the Examiner's final
rejection of claims 16-19 and 21-35, which are all of the claims pending in this
application. Claims 1-15 and 20 have been canceled.
We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007