The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte PATRICIA ANN BURNS, RAJ D. PATEL, HADI KHAN and RONALD F. ZIOLO __________ Appeal No. 2006-3224 Application No. 10/063,656 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before SCHEINER, MILLS, and LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges. LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal involves claims to a process of making polymeric microspheres for biomedical applications. The Examiner has rejected the claims as obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134. Because the Examiner failed to establish prima facie obviousness of the claimed subject matter, we reverse. Background Polymeric microspheres have a variety of uses in the medical and industrial areas. Specification, [0002]. They have been used as drug carriers, in diagnostic testing, and for therapeutic uses. Id., [0002]-[0003]. Various methods of makingPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007