Ex Parte Ramakrishnan - Page 7


                Appeal No. 2006-3253                                                                            Page 7                   
                Application No. 10/276,547                                                                                               

                        Appellant argues the Geerts declaration2 and the Soga reference3 provide “data                                   
                [that] confirms the specification’s teaching of the protein’s utility:  ‘Diabetes also can be                            
                potentially treated by regulating the activity of human DA-like GPCR.’”  Appeal Brief,                                   
                page 5 (quoting the specification at page 51, lines 28-29).  Specifically, Appellant points                              
                to the declaration and the reference as evidence that compounds that bind the protein                                    
                of SEQ ID NO:2 would potentially be useful in treating diabetes.                                                         
                        We do not agree with Appellant’s position.  The Geerts declaration provides                                      
                tissue-specific expression data similar to that of the specification’s Table 1.  ¶ 9 and                                 
                Exhibit 1.  The data in the Geerts declaration show relative expression levels in different                              
                tissue samples.  The relative level of expression in pancreas is 138.  Exhibit 1, page 3.                                
                Equal or higher expression levels are shown for 47 of the 136 tissue samples tested.                                     
                Id., pages 1-6.  Ten of the tissue samples showed relative expression levels of over                                     
                1000.  Id.  The declarant concludes that “[t]he data show high expression levels in                                      
                pancreas.  This differential expression in pancreas makes the target protein useful for                                  
                screening compounds for the treatment of diabetes.”  ¶ 9.                                                                
                        While declaratory evidence as to issues of fact is entitled to substantial weight,                               
                In re Alton, 76 F.3d 1168, 37 USPQ2d 1578 (Fed. Cir. 1996), “[a]n expert opinion is no                                   
                better than the soundness of the reasons supporting it.”  Perreira v. Secretary of the                                   
                Dept. of HHS, 33 F.3d 1375, 1377 (Fed. Cir. 1994).  In this case, the declarant provided                                 
                no scientific basis for his conclusion that a relative expression level of 138, lower than                               
                46 of the 136 tested samples, means that the protein of SEQ ID NO:2 is “useful for                                       
                                                                                                                                         
                2 Declaration of Andreas Geerts submitted under 37 CFR § 1.132, filed April 21, 2005.                                    
                3 Soga et al., “Lysophosphatidylcholine enhances glucose-dependent insulin secretion via an orphan G-                    
                protein-coupled receptor,” Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., Vol. 326, pp. 744-751 (2005).                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007