Ex Parte Roth - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                         Ex parte ELDON ROTH                                                 
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2006-3262                                                
                                          Application 10/780,255                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                       Decided: November 30, 2006                                            
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before GARRIS, WARREN, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                              
                KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 17-21,                 
                23-26, and 28-32, the only claims that remain pending in this application.                   
                We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                            











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007