Appeal No. 2006-3283 Page 5
Application No. 10/606,897
Appellants maintain that Taraki fails to disclose a parameter defining a
relationship between and first and second waveforms and that the icons in Taraki
relate to display modes rather than to a measurement to be performed (Brief p. 9
and Reply Brief p. 6). We agree with Appellants and further find that Taraki does
not disclose “displaying a plurality of icons, each icon corresponding to a
measurement to be performed of a parameter defining a relationship between the
first waveform and the second waveform,” as recited in independent claim 36.
Therefore, we will not sustain the rejections of independent claim 36 and
dependent claims 37-39
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the rejection of claims 21-24, 26-33, and 35-39 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102 has been reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007